Not every organization needs a permanent CDO. We explore the scenarios where fractional or interim leadership delivers faster results — and when it’s time to hire permanently.
The instinct when a data team is struggling is to hire a senior leader. A Head of Data, a CDO, someone who can set the direction and rally the troops. It’s an understandable impulse — when something isn’t working, you want someone accountable for making it work.
But hiring permanently is slow, expensive and often premature. A senior data hire typically takes three to six months to recruit, commands a significant salary, and then needs another three to six months to understand the organisation, build relationships and start making meaningful change. That’s potentially a year before you see real impact.
There’s another way.
Three scenarios where fractional or interim makes sense
Bridging a gap. Someone has left — your Head of Data moved on, your CDO retired, your programme lead was reassigned. The work doesn’t stop just because the leader is gone. An interim steps in immediately, keeps things moving, and buys you the time to hire the right permanent replacement rather than rushing the decision.
This is the most straightforward scenario, but it’s also the one where organisations most often make mistakes. The temptation is to distribute the leaver’s responsibilities across the remaining team. In theory this sounds efficient. In practice it means nobody is truly owning the strategic direction, and the team gradually drifts.
Launching something new. You’re kicking off a data strategy, migrating to a new platform, building a team from scratch, or restructuring an existing capability. These are high-stakes transitions that benefit enormously from someone who has done it before — ideally multiple times, across different contexts.
A fractional leader brings pattern recognition that no amount of internal workshopping can replicate. They know which vendor pitches to believe and which to question. They know which organisational models work for which company sizes. They know where the common pitfalls are because they’ve fallen into them before — or, more usefully, watched others fall into them.
Scaling without the overhead. You’re a scale-up or mid-sized company that needs senior data guidance but can’t yet justify a full-time executive. A fractional data lead gives you two or three days a week of experienced leadership at a fraction of the cost of a permanent hire.
This model works particularly well for organisations that have a competent data team but lack strategic direction. The team can execute, but they need someone to set priorities, unblock decisions and represent data at the leadership table.
What we actually do
We don’t just advise. We step into the role. That means running stand-ups, presenting to the board, unblocking the engineering team, and making the hard prioritisation calls that everyone else has been avoiding.
It means sitting in the weekly leadership meeting and advocating for the data function — not as an external consultant with a deck, but as a member of the team with a seat at the table. It means having the difficult conversation with the business stakeholder whose pet project isn’t going to get prioritised. It means staying late to help the junior data engineer debug a pipeline issue because that’s what leaders do.
The distinction matters. Advisory is valuable, but it doesn’t replace leadership. When a team needs direction, they need someone who is visibly in charge — someone who makes decisions, takes responsibility for outcomes and shows up every day.
Working across levels
One of the advantages of experienced interim leadership is the ability to operate across the full organisational hierarchy. In a typical engagement, we might present a data strategy to the executive board in the morning, run a sprint planning session with the engineering team after lunch, and have a one-on-one with a struggling team member in the afternoon.
This versatility is hard to hire for permanently. Most candidates are either strategic (good in the boardroom, less effective with the team) or operational (great with the team, uncomfortable presenting to executives). Having done this across multiple organisations, we’ve learned to bridge both worlds effectively.
We understand the strategic agenda — what the business is trying to achieve and why data matters to that ambition. And we understand the operational realities — what the team can actually deliver, what’s blocking them, and what they need to succeed.
Building for the handover
Every interim engagement should have an end date in mind. We’re not building a dependency — we’re building capability. From day one, we’re thinking about what needs to be in place for a permanent leader to succeed.
That means documenting decisions and their rationale. It means establishing processes that don’t depend on any individual. It means developing internal talent so the team isn’t starting from scratch when we leave. And it often means helping define the permanent role and supporting the hiring process.
The best outcome for an interim engagement is that when we step back, the team barely notices — because the structures, processes and momentum are already embedded.
When to hire permanently
Interim leadership isn’t a substitute for permanent leadership. It’s a bridge. The right time to transition to a permanent hire is when the direction is set, the team is stable, and you need someone to own it for the long term — someone who will grow with the organisation and build deep institutional knowledge.
If you’re not at that point yet — if the direction isn’t clear, if the team needs building, if you’re not sure what kind of leader you need — an interim engagement is often the fastest way to find out. We’ll help you answer those questions, and when the time is right, we’ll help you find the right person to take over.
Back to all articles